Best Known (85−27, 85, s)-Nets in Base 5
(85−27, 85, 252)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 85, 252)-net over F5, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 96, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 48, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 48, 126)-net over F25, using
(85−27, 85, 552)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (58, 85, 552)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(585, 552, F5, 27) (dual of [552, 467, 28]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(585, 624, F5, 27) (dual of [624, 539, 28]-code), using
(85−27, 85, 46524)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 85, 46525)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (58, 84, 46525)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 51706 463192 097798 545357 828068 553652 879663 879846 212786 363781 > 584 [i]