Best Known (61, 61+28, s)-Nets in Base 5
(61, 61+28, 252)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 89, 252)-net over F5, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (61, 102, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 51, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 51, 126)-net over F25, using
(61, 61+28, 595)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (61, 89, 595)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(589, 595, F5, 28) (dual of [595, 506, 29]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(589, 624, F5, 28) (dual of [624, 535, 29]-code), using
(61, 61+28, 41951)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 89, 41952)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 161 591276 739571 866895 798720 924613 600503 871085 153999 164471 924225 > 589 [i]