Best Known (130−29, 130, s)-Nets in Base 5
(130−29, 130, 504)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (101, 130, 504)-net over F5, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (101, 132, 504)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (35, 50, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 25, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 25, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (51, 82, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 41, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 41, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (35, 50, 252)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(130−29, 130, 4982)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (101, 130, 4982)-net over F5, using
(130−29, 130, 4167791)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (101, 130, 4167792)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (101, 129, 4167792)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1 469368 173259 678422 843842 515082 603675 980021 462169 549852 447737 737170 859857 379094 906813 823745 > 5129 [i]