Best Known (109, 109+29, s)-Nets in Base 5
(109, 109+29, 520)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (109, 138, 520)-net over F5, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 12, 16)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 15)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 15)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (34, 48, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 24, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 24, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (49, 78, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 39, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 39, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (3, 12, 16)-net over F5, using
(109, 109+29, 7882)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (109, 138, 7882)-net over F5, using
(109, 109+29, large)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (109, 138, large)-net in base 5, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (109, 111, large)-net in base 5, but