Best Known (109, 109+31, s)-Nets in Base 5
(109, 109+31, 504)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (109, 140, 504)-net over F5, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (109, 144, 504)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (37, 54, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 27, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 27, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (55, 90, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 45, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 45, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (37, 54, 252)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(109, 109+31, 5518)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (109, 140, 5518)-net over F5, using
(109, 109+31, 4817566)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (109, 140, 4817567)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (109, 139, 4817567)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 14 349317 480678 972805 241268 933593 130667 704873 342345 900849 044351 477915 153168 141952 869185 337685 959749 > 5139 [i]