Best Known (26−7, 26, s)-Nets in Base 5
(26−7, 26, 1043)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 26, 1043)-net over F5, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(526, 1043, F5, 7, 7) (dual of [(1043, 7), 7275, 8]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(526, 3130, F5, 7) (dual of [3130, 3104, 8]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(6) ⊂ Ce(5) [i] based on
- linear OA(526, 3125, F5, 7) (dual of [3125, 3099, 8]-code), using an extension Ce(6) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 3124 = 55−1, defining interval I = [1,6], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 7 [i]
- linear OA(521, 3125, F5, 6) (dual of [3125, 3104, 7]-code), using an extension Ce(5) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 3124 = 55−1, defining interval I = [1,5], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 6 [i]
- linear OA(50, 5, F5, 0) (dual of [5, 5, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(50, s, F5, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(6) ⊂ Ce(5) [i] based on
- OOA 3-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(526, 3130, F5, 7) (dual of [3130, 3104, 8]-code), using
(26−7, 26, 2033)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (19, 26, 2033)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(526, 2033, F5, 7) (dual of [2033, 2007, 8]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(526, 3124, F5, 7) (dual of [3124, 3098, 8]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 3124 = 55−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 8 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(526, 3124, F5, 7) (dual of [3124, 3098, 8]-code), using
(26−7, 26, 303438)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 26, 303439)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (19, 25, 303439)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 298023 446587 357749 > 525 [i]