Best Known (89−70, 89, s)-Nets in Base 5
(89−70, 89, 43)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 89, 43)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (18, 89, 43)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 42)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F5 with g(F) = 17, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 42)-sequence over F5, using
(89−70, 89, 45)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (19, 89, 45)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 44)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
(89−70, 89, 102)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 89, 103)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (19, 88, 103)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(588, 103, S5, 69), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 55 800890 235262 458139 981804 969157 255791 323279 936477 774754 166603 088378 906250 / 1 472522 247119 > 588 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(588, 103, S5, 69), but