Best Known (145−75, 145, s)-Nets in Base 5
(145−75, 145, 84)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (70, 145, 84)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 39, 12)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 11)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 11)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (31, 106, 72)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 71)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 72, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 71)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (2, 39, 12)-net over F5, using
(145−75, 145, 132)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (70, 145, 132)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (67, 145, 132)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (67, 131)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 67 and N(F) ≥ 132, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (67, 131)-sequence over F5, using
(145−75, 145, 1896)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (70, 145, 1897)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (70, 144, 1897)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 45083 284065 105969 091082 974891 236274 911412 310321 353283 446168 382990 550027 018129 124190 199147 383109 559125 > 5144 [i]