Best Known (111−84, 111, s)-Nets in Base 5
(111−84, 111, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 111, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 111, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(111−84, 111, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (27, 111, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 111, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(111−84, 111, 258)-Net over F5 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (27, 111, 259)-net over F5, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(5111, 259, F5, 84) (dual of [259, 148, 85]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(5110, 144, S5, 84), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 91 409242 726417 624095 344105 505405 630376 260462 681874 772811 345983 107578 216930 733105 982653 796672 821044 921875 / 1070 506247 537363 410554 373824 > 5110 [i]
- linear OA(5148, 259, F5, 115) (dual of [259, 111, 116]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(5148, 250, F5, 115) (dual of [250, 102, 116]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(533, 134, S5, 23), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 7 905984 850652 471068 879589 438438 415527 343750 / 66 073848 265952 909413 > 533 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(533, 134, S5, 23), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(5148, 250, F5, 115) (dual of [250, 102, 116]-code), but
- OA(5110, 144, S5, 84), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
(111−84, 111, 260)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 111, 261)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 411954 426073 740232 964072 329639 302240 836194 144317 280694 447655 717872 606672 021625 > 5111 [i]