Best Known (94−85, 94, s)-Nets in Base 5
(94−85, 94, 26)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 94, 26)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 25)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 26, using
(94−85, 94, 52)-Net over F5 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (9, 94, 53)-net over F5, because
- 45 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (9, 49, 53)-net over F5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(549, 53, F5, 40) (dual of [53, 4, 41]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(59, 12, F5, 8) (dual of [12, 3, 9]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(549, 53, F5, 40) (dual of [53, 4, 41]-code), but
(94−85, 94, 55)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 94, 56)-net in base 5, because
- 46 times m-reduction [i] would yield (9, 48, 56)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(548, 56, S5, 39), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 877520 278663 723729 550838 470458 984375 / 207 > 548 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(548, 56, S5, 39), but