Best Known (113−88, 113, s)-Nets in Base 5
(113−88, 113, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 113, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 113, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(113−88, 113, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (25, 113, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 113, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(113−88, 113, 130)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 113, 131)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (25, 112, 131)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5112, 131, S5, 87), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 64819 052034 878709 570998 680623 667131 742908 124355 154035 091397 535239 821081 631816 923618 316650 390625 / 25832 927656 150384 > 5112 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5112, 131, S5, 87), but