Best Known (26, 26+88, s)-Nets in Base 5
(26, 26+88, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 114, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 114, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(26, 26+88, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (26, 114, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 114, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(26, 26+88, 136)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 114, 137)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 113, 137)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5113, 137, S5, 87), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 219 254254 269057 021795 971008 054503 692073 648173 260601 093050 546628 315800 035124 993883 073329 925537 109375 / 22 636214 711090 563132 > 5113 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5113, 137, S5, 87), but