Best Known (28−9, 28, s)-Nets in Base 5
(28−9, 28, 132)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 28, 132)-net over F5, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (19, 30, 132)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 15, 66)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 15, 66)-net over F25, using
(28−9, 28, 268)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (19, 28, 268)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(528, 268, F5, 9) (dual of [268, 240, 10]-code), using
- 135 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 24 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 45 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(520, 125, F5, 9) (dual of [125, 105, 10]-code), using
- a “GraX†code from Grassl’s database [i]
- 135 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 24 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 45 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(520, 125, F5, 9) (dual of [125, 105, 10]-code), using
(28−9, 28, 28906)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 28, 28907)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (19, 27, 28907)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 7 450596 434452 913265 > 527 [i]