Best Known (115−90, 115, s)-Nets in Base 5
(115−90, 115, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 115, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 115, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(115−90, 115, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (25, 115, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 115, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(115−90, 115, 129)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 115, 130)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (25, 114, 130)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5114, 130, S5, 89), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2 714752 481472 636819 003446 408307 138614 112384 082080 638159 073515 680574 928410 351276 397705 078125 / 40501 705629 > 5114 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5114, 130, S5, 89), but