Best Known (117−90, 117, s)-Nets in Base 5
(117−90, 117, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 117, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 117, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(117−90, 117, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (27, 117, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 117, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(117−90, 117, 142)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 117, 143)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 116, 143)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5116, 143, S5, 89), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2738 237588 593697 454668 762256 522048 887080 570758 264064 445890 203342 535984 543104 632393 806241 452693 939208 984375 / 2 228541 507840 976583 547528 > 5116 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5116, 143, S5, 89), but