Best Known (27, 27+94, s)-Nets in Base 5
(27, 27+94, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 121, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 121, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(27, 27+94, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (27, 121, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 121, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(27, 27+94, 138)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 121, 139)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 120, 139)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5120, 139, S5, 93), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 27858 012410 071478 273208 995833 145273 886678 323269 030897 943996 684384 959650 060409 330762 922763 824462 890625 / 33773 631432 131241 > 5120 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5120, 139, S5, 93), but