Best Known (28, 28+96, s)-Nets in Base 5
(28, 28+96, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 124, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 124, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(28, 28+96, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (28, 124, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 124, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(28, 28+96, 144)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 124, 145)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 123, 145)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5123, 145, S5, 95), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 523946 922524 269524 545786 907827 294722 187715 168920 019132 326750 498085 399243 564097 560010 850429 534912 109375 / 4025 476446 595648 > 5123 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5123, 145, S5, 95), but