Best Known (69, 102, s)-Nets in Base 5
(69, 102, 258)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 102, 258)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 16, 6)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 5)-sequence over F5, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- the rational function field F5(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 5)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (53, 86, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 43, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 43, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (0, 16, 6)-net over F5, using
(69, 102, 556)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (69, 102, 556)-net over F5, using
(69, 102, 43915)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 102, 43916)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 101, 43916)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 39456 984652 057525 785908 571844 175880 890180 589308 500704 981364 041183 340545 > 5101 [i]