Best Known (86, 110, s)-Nets in Base 5
(86, 110, 460)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 110, 460)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (30, 42, 208)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 21, 104)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 21, 104)-net over F25, using
- digital (44, 68, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 34, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 34, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (30, 42, 208)-net over F5, using
(86, 110, 5203)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (86, 110, 5203)-net over F5, using
(86, 110, 3376955)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 110, 3376956)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 77037 268209 015564 721928 297917 881367 721309 584418 906197 146994 187032 010035 399425 > 5110 [i]