Best Known (66, 129, s)-Nets in Base 5
(66, 129, 90)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 129, 90)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 35, 18)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 17)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 18, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 17)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (31, 94, 72)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 71)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 72, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 71)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (4, 35, 18)-net over F5, using
(66, 129, 139)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (66, 129, 139)-net over F5, using
(66, 129, 2365)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 129, 2366)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (66, 128, 2366)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 296274 638645 435700 450743 932919 550263 545026 531108 663605 350054 356514 861232 804217 223760 042265 > 5128 [i]