Best Known (25, 134, s)-Nets in Base 5
(25, 134, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 134, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 134, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(25, 134, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (25, 134, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 134, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(25, 134, 128)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 134, 129)-net in base 5, because
- 18 times m-reduction [i] would yield (25, 116, 129)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5116, 129, S5, 91), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 11 958351 050689 163710 066275 542623 394170 276397 455664 717239 809391 458038 589917 123317 718505 859375 / 9241 308483 > 5116 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5116, 129, S5, 91), but