Best Known (26, 138, s)-Nets in Base 5
(26, 138, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 138, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 138, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(26, 138, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (26, 138, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 138, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(26, 138, 133)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 138, 134)-net in base 5, because
- 20 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 118, 134)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5118, 134, S5, 92), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 8400 170840 072152 236399 189268 979920 771007 847581 356717 606149 153709 793608 868494 629859 924316 406250 / 238763 600747 > 5118 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5118, 134, S5, 92), but