Best Known (9, 14, s)-Nets in Base 5
(9, 14, 600)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 14, 600)-net over F5, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(514, 600, F5, 5, 5) (dual of [(600, 5), 2986, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(514, 1201, F5, 5) (dual of [1201, 1187, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(514, 1202, F5, 5) (dual of [1202, 1188, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(257, 601, F25, 5) (dual of [601, 594, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(514, 1202, F5, 5) (dual of [1202, 1188, 6]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(514, 1201, F5, 5) (dual of [1201, 1187, 6]-code), using
(9, 14, 601)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (9, 14, 601)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(514, 601, F5, 2, 5) (dual of [(601, 2), 1188, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(514, 1202, F5, 5) (dual of [1202, 1188, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(257, 601, F25, 5) (dual of [601, 594, 6]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(514, 1202, F5, 5) (dual of [1202, 1188, 6]-code), using
(9, 14, 12351)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 14, 12352)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (9, 13, 12352)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1220 772865 > 513 [i]