Best Known (69, 140, s)-Nets in Base 5
(69, 140, 88)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 140, 88)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 38, 16)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 15)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 15)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (31, 102, 72)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 71)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 72, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 71)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (3, 38, 16)-net over F5, using
(69, 140, 132)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (69, 140, 132)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (67, 140, 132)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (67, 131)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 67 and N(F) ≥ 132, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (67, 131)-sequence over F5, using
(69, 140, 2049)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 140, 2050)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 139, 2050)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 14 393383 646299 481428 222678 748590 752311 417911 450002 721629 067502 708169 912359 557000 660755 008232 720809 > 5139 [i]