Best Known (89, 141, s)-Nets in Base 5
(89, 141, 252)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 141, 252)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (85, 141, 252)-net over F5, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 150, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 75, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 75, 126)-net over F25, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 150, 252)-net over F5, using
(89, 141, 412)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (89, 141, 412)-net over F5, using
(89, 141, 16266)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 141, 16267)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 359 013204 040397 101997 009885 155638 104706 629275 984576 195414 259507 657679 133687 473001 212024 844821 984025 > 5141 [i]