Best Known (69, 142, s)-Nets in Base 5
(69, 142, 84)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 142, 84)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 38, 12)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 11)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 11)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (31, 104, 72)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 71)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 72, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 71)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (2, 38, 12)-net over F5, using
(69, 142, 132)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (69, 142, 132)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (67, 142, 132)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (67, 131)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 67 and N(F) ≥ 132, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (67, 131)-sequence over F5, using
(69, 142, 1924)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 142, 1925)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 141, 1925)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 359 641364 800979 492388 561138 332476 282019 884758 056019 609539 087497 540159 023664 943862 546124 506253 656689 > 5141 [i]