Best Known (106, 143, s)-Nets in Base 5
(106, 143, 410)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (106, 143, 410)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 19, 10)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 9)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 9)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (87, 124, 400)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (25, 62, 200)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 199)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 200, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 199)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (25, 62, 200)-net over F25, using
- digital (1, 19, 10)-net over F5, using
(106, 143, 2152)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (106, 143, 2152)-net over F5, using
(106, 143, 616818)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (106, 143, 616819)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (106, 142, 616819)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1793 671672 897373 122065 679290 792201 379689 481418 639467 621018 689821 282019 843313 547251 299481 681382 931001 > 5142 [i]