Best Known (86, 143, s)-Nets in Base 5
(86, 143, 252)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 143, 252)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (85, 143, 252)-net over F5, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 150, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 75, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 75, 126)-net over F25, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 150, 252)-net over F5, using
(86, 143, 311)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (86, 143, 311)-net over F5, using
(86, 143, 9881)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 143, 9882)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 142, 9882)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1796 288501 325319 402140 274296 282762 305061 338075 799806 260353 264952 691737 730486 610773 707837 586015 097025 > 5142 [i]