Best Known (90, 143, s)-Nets in Base 5
(90, 143, 252)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 143, 252)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (85, 143, 252)-net over F5, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 150, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 75, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 75, 126)-net over F25, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 150, 252)-net over F5, using
(90, 143, 409)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (90, 143, 409)-net over F5, using
(90, 143, 17306)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 143, 17307)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 142, 17307)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1795 113585 964174 780321 276403 066743 540717 005587 131348 490101 687288 890370 530362 971612 109472 126167 016217 > 5142 [i]