Best Known (92, 148, s)-Nets in Base 5
(92, 148, 252)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 148, 252)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (85, 148, 252)-net over F5, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 150, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 75, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 75, 126)-net over F25, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 150, 252)-net over F5, using
(92, 148, 389)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (92, 148, 389)-net over F5, using
(92, 148, 13959)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 148, 13960)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 28 065014 453800 382242 576073 060843 021449 348001 112275 474923 953461 082300 261635 047995 364011 183845 687173 139457 > 5148 [i]