Best Known (11, 16, s)-Nets in Base 5
(11, 16, 606)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 16, 606)-net over F5, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(516, 606, F5, 6, 5) (dual of [(606, 6), 3620, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(516, 607, F5, 2, 5) (dual of [(607, 2), 1198, 6]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(52, 6, F5, 2, 2) (dual of [(6, 2), 10, 3]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;10,5) [i]
- linear OOA(514, 601, F5, 2, 5) (dual of [(601, 2), 1188, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(514, 1202, F5, 5) (dual of [1202, 1188, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(257, 601, F25, 5) (dual of [601, 594, 6]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(514, 1202, F5, 5) (dual of [1202, 1188, 6]-code), using
- linear OOA(52, 6, F5, 2, 2) (dual of [(6, 2), 10, 3]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- OOA stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(516, 607, F5, 2, 5) (dual of [(607, 2), 1198, 6]-NRT-code), using
(11, 16, 1208)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (11, 16, 1208)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(516, 1208, F5, 5) (dual of [1208, 1192, 6]-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OA(52, 6, F5, 2) (dual of [6, 4, 3]-code or 6-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(4,5) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,5) [i]
- linear OA(514, 1202, F5, 5) (dual of [1202, 1188, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(257, 601, F25, 5) (dual of [601, 594, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(52, 6, F5, 2) (dual of [6, 4, 3]-code or 6-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(11, 16, 61762)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 16, 61763)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (11, 15, 61763)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 30518 333561 > 515 [i]