Best Known (11, 18, s)-Nets in Base 5
(11, 18, 100)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 18, 100)-net over F5, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 1, 25)-net over F5, using
- s-reduction based on digital (0, 1, s)-net over F5 with arbitrarily large s, using
- digital (1, 3, 25)-net over F5, using
- s-reduction based on digital (1, 3, 31)-net over F5, using
- digital (1, 4, 25)-net over F5, using
- s-reduction based on digital (1, 4, 26)-net over F5, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(54, 26, F5, 3, 3) (dual of [(26, 3), 74, 4]-NRT-code), using
- s-reduction based on digital (1, 4, 26)-net over F5, using
- digital (3, 10, 25)-net over F5, using
- digital (0, 1, 25)-net over F5, using
(11, 18, 134)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (11, 18, 134)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(518, 134, F5, 7) (dual of [134, 116, 8]-code), using
- 4 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 0, 0) [i] based on linear OA(516, 128, F5, 7) (dual of [128, 112, 8]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(6) ⊂ Ce(5) [i] based on
- linear OA(516, 125, F5, 7) (dual of [125, 109, 8]-code), using an extension Ce(6) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 124 = 53−1, defining interval I = [1,6], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 7 [i]
- linear OA(513, 125, F5, 6) (dual of [125, 112, 7]-code), using an extension Ce(5) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 124 = 53−1, defining interval I = [1,5], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 6 [i]
- linear OA(50, 3, F5, 0) (dual of [3, 3, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(50, s, F5, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(6) ⊂ Ce(5) [i] based on
- 4 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 0, 0) [i] based on linear OA(516, 128, F5, 7) (dual of [128, 112, 8]-code), using
(11, 18, 4149)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 18, 4150)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (11, 17, 4150)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 763347 364601 > 517 [i]