Best Known (3, 19, s)-Nets in Base 5
(3, 19, 16)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (3, 19, 16)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 15)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
(3, 19, 22)-Net over F5 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (3, 19, 23)-net over F5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (3, 18, 23)-net over F5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(518, 23, F5, 15) (dual of [23, 5, 16]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(53, 7, S5, 3), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(518, 23, F5, 15) (dual of [23, 5, 16]-code), but
(3, 19, 30)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (3, 19, 31)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (3, 18, 31)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(518, 31, S5, 2, 15), but
- the linear programming bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 3 517198 136814 630536 328002 356852 932502 557478 924518 706687 927246 093750 / 890186 821974 662831 442996 193641 186220 027713 081363 462721 > 518 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(518, 31, S5, 2, 15), but