Best Known (22, 33, s)-Nets in Base 5
(22, 33, 132)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 33, 132)-net over F5, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (22, 36, 132)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 18, 66)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 18, 66)-net over F25, using
(22, 33, 313)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (22, 33, 313)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(533, 313, F5, 2, 11) (dual of [(313, 2), 593, 12]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(533, 626, F5, 11) (dual of [626, 593, 12]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 626 | 58−1, defining interval I = [0,5], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−5,−4,…,5}|+1 = 12 (BCH-bound) [i]
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(533, 626, F5, 11) (dual of [626, 593, 12]-code), using
(22, 33, 19369)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 33, 19370)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (22, 32, 19370)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 23287 941462 367417 655977 > 532 [i]