Best Known (36, 53, s)-Nets in Base 5
(36, 53, 208)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 53, 208)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 54, 208)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 27, 104)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 27, 104)-net over F25, using
(36, 53, 416)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (36, 53, 416)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(553, 416, F5, 17) (dual of [416, 363, 18]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(553, 624, F5, 17) (dual of [624, 571, 18]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 18 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(553, 624, F5, 17) (dual of [624, 571, 18]-code), using
(36, 53, 32874)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 53, 32875)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 52, 32875)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 2 220581 283889 165447 753310 110654 936801 > 552 [i]