Best Known (36, 65, s)-Nets in Base 5
(36, 65, 104)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 65, 104)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 66, 104)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 33, 52)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 33, 52)-net over F25, using
(36, 65, 112)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (36, 65, 112)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 66, 112)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 33, 56)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 55)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 55)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 33, 56)-net over F25, using
(36, 65, 2359)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 65, 2360)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 64, 2360)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 543 086328 521663 726314 951120 342449 553726 861185 > 564 [i]