Best Known (69, 94, s)-Nets in Base 5
(69, 94, 304)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 94, 304)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (12, 24, 52)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 12, 26)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 25)-sequence over F25, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26, using
- the rational function field F25(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 25)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 12, 26)-net over F25, using
- digital (45, 70, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 35, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 35, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (12, 24, 52)-net over F5, using
(69, 94, 1351)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (69, 94, 1351)-net over F5, using
(69, 94, 345388)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 94, 345389)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 93, 345389)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 100974 848056 109383 639123 229301 792832 100141 817936 959120 204217 823953 > 593 [i]