Best Known (74, 97, s)-Nets in Base 5
(74, 97, 400)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (74, 97, 400)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (74, 98, 400)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (25, 49, 200)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 199)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 200, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 199)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (25, 49, 200)-net over F25, using
(74, 97, 3181)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (74, 97, 3181)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(597, 3181, F5, 23) (dual of [3181, 3084, 24]-code), using
- 39 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 22 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(592, 3137, F5, 23) (dual of [3137, 3045, 24]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,11]) ⊂ C([0,10]) [i] based on
- linear OA(591, 3126, F5, 23) (dual of [3126, 3035, 24]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 3126 | 510−1, defining interval I = [0,11], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−11,−10,…,11}|+1 = 24 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(581, 3126, F5, 21) (dual of [3126, 3045, 22]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 3126 | 510−1, defining interval I = [0,10], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−10,−9,…,10}|+1 = 22 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(51, 11, F5, 1) (dual of [11, 10, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(51, s, F5, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,11]) ⊂ C([0,10]) [i] based on
- 39 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 22 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(592, 3137, F5, 23) (dual of [3137, 3045, 24]-code), using
(74, 97, 1545446)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (74, 97, 1545447)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (74, 96, 1545447)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 12 621861 700231 835332 804204 384915 136844 082185 035981 637734 914577 694709 > 596 [i]