Best Known (17−10, 17, s)-Nets in Base 64
(17−10, 17, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (7, 17, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
(17−10, 17, 202)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (7, 17, 202)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(6417, 202, F64, 10) (dual of [202, 185, 11]-code), using
(17−10, 17, 259)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(7, 17, 259)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (7, 20, 259)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 15, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 15, 259)-net over F256, using
(17−10, 17, 321)-Net in Base 64
(7, 17, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (7, 20, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 15, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 15, 321)-net over F256, using
(17−10, 17, 57212)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (7, 17, 57213)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 5 070771 304122 500904 786672 325240 > 6417 [i]