Best Known (29, 29+10, s)-Nets in Base 64
(29, 29+10, 1677720)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 39, 1677720)-net over F64, using
- 642 times duplication [i] based on digital (27, 37, 1677720)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6437, 1677720, F64, 10, 10) (dual of [(1677720, 10), 16777163, 11]-NRT-code), using
- OA 5-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(6437, 8388600, F64, 10) (dual of [8388600, 8388563, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6437, large, F64, 10) (dual of [large, large−37, 11]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 644−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6437, large, F64, 10) (dual of [large, large−37, 11]-code), using
- OA 5-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(6437, 8388600, F64, 10) (dual of [8388600, 8388563, 11]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6437, 1677720, F64, 10, 10) (dual of [(1677720, 10), 16777163, 11]-NRT-code), using
(29, 29+10, large)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (29, 39, large)-net over F64, using
- 641 times duplication [i] based on digital (28, 38, large)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(6438, large, F64, 10) (dual of [large, large−38, 11]-code), using
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(6437, large, F64, 10) (dual of [large, large−37, 11]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 644−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(6437, large, F64, 10) (dual of [large, large−37, 11]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(6438, large, F64, 10) (dual of [large, large−38, 11]-code), using
(29, 29+10, large)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 39, large)-net in base 64, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 31, large)-net in base 64, but