Best Known (16−11, 16, s)-Nets in Base 64
(16−11, 16, 130)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (5, 16, 130)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 5, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (0, 11, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64 (see above)
- digital (0, 5, 65)-net over F64, using
(16−11, 16, 133)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (5, 16, 133)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 132)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 133, using
(16−11, 16, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(5, 16, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 12, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
(16−11, 16, 289)-Net in Base 64
(5, 16, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 12, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
(16−11, 16, 10838)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (5, 16, 10839)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (5, 15, 10839)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 1238 466030 010664 837107 747330 > 6415 [i]