Best Known (9, 9+16, s)-Nets in Base 64
(9, 9+16, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 25, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 25, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(9, 9+16, 209)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (9, 25, 209)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 209, using
(9, 9+16, 259)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(9, 25, 259)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 28, 259)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
(9, 9+16, 321)-Net in Base 64
(9, 25, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 28, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 321)-net over F256, using
(9, 9+16, 26339)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 25, 26340)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 1427 606127 001546 497593 547142 310004 314959 815700 > 6425 [i]