Best Known (10, 10+18, s)-Nets in Base 64
(10, 10+18, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (10, 28, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 28, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(10, 10+18, 225)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (10, 28, 225)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
(10, 10+18, 260)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(10, 28, 260)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 21, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
(10, 10+18, 321)-Net in Base 64
(10, 28, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 32, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 24, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 24, 321)-net over F256, using
(10, 10+18, 27388)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (10, 28, 27389)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 374 178348 012848 687655 335774 588524 230404 595404 952220 > 6428 [i]