Best Known (66−20, 66, s)-Nets in Base 64
(66−20, 66, 26217)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 66, 26217)-net over F64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 67, 26217)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6467, 26217, F64, 21, 21) (dual of [(26217, 21), 550490, 22]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 10-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6467, 262171, F64, 21) (dual of [262171, 262104, 22]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(20) ⊂ Ce(13) [i] based on
- linear OA(6461, 262144, F64, 21) (dual of [262144, 262083, 22]-code), using an extension Ce(20) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 643−1, defining interval I = [1,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
- linear OA(6440, 262144, F64, 14) (dual of [262144, 262104, 15]-code), using an extension Ce(13) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 643−1, defining interval I = [1,13], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 14 [i]
- linear OA(646, 27, F64, 6) (dual of [27, 21, 7]-code or 27-arc in PG(5,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(646, 64, F64, 6) (dual of [64, 58, 7]-code or 64-arc in PG(5,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(58,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(646, 64, F64, 6) (dual of [64, 58, 7]-code or 64-arc in PG(5,64)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(20) ⊂ Ce(13) [i] based on
- OOA 10-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6467, 262171, F64, 21) (dual of [262171, 262104, 22]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6467, 26217, F64, 21, 21) (dual of [(26217, 21), 550490, 22]-NRT-code), using
(66−20, 66, 262179)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (46, 66, 262179)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(6466, 262179, F64, 20) (dual of [262179, 262113, 21]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(19) ⊂ Ce(10) [i] based on
- linear OA(6458, 262144, F64, 20) (dual of [262144, 262086, 21]-code), using an extension Ce(19) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 643−1, defining interval I = [1,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 20 [i]
- linear OA(6431, 262144, F64, 11) (dual of [262144, 262113, 12]-code), using an extension Ce(10) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 643−1, defining interval I = [1,10], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- linear OA(648, 35, F64, 8) (dual of [35, 27, 9]-code or 35-arc in PG(7,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(648, 64, F64, 8) (dual of [64, 56, 9]-code or 64-arc in PG(7,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(56,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(648, 64, F64, 8) (dual of [64, 56, 9]-code or 64-arc in PG(7,64)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(19) ⊂ Ce(10) [i] based on
(66−20, 66, large)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 66, large)-net in base 64, because
- 18 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 48, large)-net in base 64, but