Best Known (37−22, 37, s)-Nets in Base 64
(37−22, 37, 184)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (15, 37, 184)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 12, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (3, 25, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (1, 12, 80)-net over F64, using
(37−22, 37, 259)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (15, 37, 259)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(6437, 259, F64, 2, 22) (dual of [(259, 2), 481, 23]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,489P) ⊂ AG(2;F,493P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(6434, 256, F64, 2, 22) (dual of [(256, 2), 478, 23]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,489P) [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- linear OOA(6430, 256, F64, 2, 18) (dual of [(256, 2), 482, 19]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,493P) [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257 (see above)
- linear OOA(643, 3, F64, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(643, 64, F64, 2, 3) (dual of [(64, 2), 125, 4]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;125,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(643, 64, F64, 2, 3) (dual of [(64, 2), 125, 4]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,489P) ⊂ AG(2;F,493P) [i] based on
(37−22, 37, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(15, 37, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 42, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 36, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 36, 288)-net over F128, using
(37−22, 37, 321)-Net in Base 64
(15, 37, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 52, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 39, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 39, 321)-net over F256, using
(37−22, 37, 92679)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (15, 37, 92680)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 6 740673 927978 686146 059960 601655 413306 258654 850431 936923 247051 379776 > 6437 [i]