Best Known (10, 10+23, s)-Nets in Base 64
(10, 10+23, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (10, 33, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 33, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(10, 10+23, 225)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (10, 33, 225)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
(10, 10+23, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(10, 33, 258)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 36, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 258)-net over F256, using
(10, 10+23, 289)-Net in Base 64
(10, 33, 289)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 36, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 289)-net over F256, using
(10, 10+23, 13991)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (10, 33, 13992)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (10, 32, 13992)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 6281 080558 585259 749061 111526 830403 694729 107937 666402 324900 > 6432 [i]