Best Known (85−25, 85, s)-Nets in Base 64
(85−25, 85, 21910)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (60, 85, 21910)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 12, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (48, 73, 21845)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6473, 21845, F64, 25, 25) (dual of [(21845, 25), 546052, 26]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 12-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6473, 262141, F64, 25) (dual of [262141, 262068, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6473, 262144, F64, 25) (dual of [262144, 262071, 26]-code), using
- an extension Ce(24) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 643−1, defining interval I = [1,24], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 25 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6473, 262144, F64, 25) (dual of [262144, 262071, 26]-code), using
- OOA 12-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6473, 262141, F64, 25) (dual of [262141, 262068, 26]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6473, 21845, F64, 25, 25) (dual of [(21845, 25), 546052, 26]-NRT-code), using
- digital (0, 12, 65)-net over F64, using
(85−25, 85, 388082)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (60, 85, 388082)-net over F64, using
(85−25, 85, large)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (60, 85, large)-net in base 64, because
- 23 times m-reduction [i] would yield (60, 62, large)-net in base 64, but