Best Known (34−29, 34, s)-Nets in Base 64
(34−29, 34, 128)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (5, 34, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
(34−29, 34, 129)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(5, 34, 129)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (5, 35, 129)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 30, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- the rational function field F128(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 30, 129)-net over F128, using
(34−29, 34, 133)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (5, 34, 133)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 132)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 133, using
(34−29, 34, 1729)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (5, 34, 1730)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (5, 33, 1730)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 404170 926022 668972 720944 127498 836359 364827 548362 986362 738976 > 6433 [i]