MinT - Best Known (46−29, 46, s)-Nets in Base 64

Best Known (46−29, 46, s)-Nets in Base 64

(46−29, 46, 177)-Net over F₆₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (17, 46, 177)-net over F₆₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 46, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
    - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(46−29, 46, 267)-Net over F₆₄ — Digital

Digital (17, 46, 267)-net over F₆₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (16, 46, 267)-net over F₆₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 266)-sequence over F₆₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 267, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(46−29, 46, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive

(17, 46, 288)-net in base 64, using

10 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 56, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 288)-net over F₁₂₈, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(46−29, 46, 321)-Net in Base 64

(17, 46, 321)-net in base 64, using

14 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 60, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 45, 321)-net over F₂₅₆, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅₆ with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
      - sharp bound on the number of rational points on curves with genus 2 [i]

(46−29, 46, 61326)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s

There is no (17, 46, 61327)-net in base 64, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (17, 45, 61327)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64^mÂ â‰¥ 1897 360400 359505 310315 460649 833589 148811 550370 646922 593613 727544 131641 405202 649969 > 64⁴⁵ [i]