Best Known (12, 12+29, s)-Nets in Base 64
(12, 12+29, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (12, 41, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 41, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(12, 12+29, 257)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (12, 41, 257)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
(12, 12+29, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(12, 41, 258)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (12, 44, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
(12, 12+29, 289)-Net in Base 64
(12, 41, 289)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (12, 44, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 33, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 33, 289)-net over F256, using
(12, 12+29, 13881)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (12, 41, 13882)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (12, 40, 13882)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 1 768606 130186 762265 243508 694604 814975 789946 232346 351079 509213 433031 892360 > 6440 [i]